Embryonic Wars Essay -- essays research papers

The specific objective of this major essay is to clarify and summarise the controversial debate concerning the ethical decency of fertilized eggnic copy for remediation purposes. This is the form of cloning that is supposedly beneficial to a barrage of medical applications. We will identify the key opposing ethical perspectives much(prenominal) as those of the justification of embryonic search based on the normative theory of consequentialism. This paper will also probe into the relatively brief story of the debate while gauging the particular stumbling blocks of disagreement which bioethicists have arrived at. The topical aspects of therapeutic cloning will be closely studied by weighing the pros and cons and gaining a greater understanding of the present scenario.Formally speaking, embryonic cloning is a technique used by researchers and animal breeders to split a single embryo into two or more embryos that will all have the same genetic information. Some more extreme forms of Embryonic or Therapeutic cloning involve the deliberate creation of an identical twin to be destroyed before implantation in order to make replacement tissues. However, these identical match are usually only six day old embryos, a minuscule collection of cells without a nervous system. Therapeutically, the notion of cloning is medically prodigious because cloned individuals at the embryonic layer "share the same immune characteristics as each other" (Harris 26). The possibility of cloning an individual at the embryo stage allows one clone to be used as a cell tissue and organ bank for the other.Embryonic cloning has a history of momentous developments and discoveries that have occurred only in the past ten or twenty years. In the nineteen eighties and early nineteen nineties, sophisticated foetal and embryological research was banned by the United States Reagan and Bush administrations due to pressure from pro-life factions of the Republican party. However, these regu lations against research into the controversial field were relaxed considerably with the inception of the more pro-choice Clinton administration. In October 1994, Robert J. Stillman shocked the world with the news of his successful "cloning of seventeen flawed human embryos at George Washington Medical Center" (Dyson & Harris 276) in the United States. Events such as this have continued to spark furiou... ...ead the developed nations to gain a proficient understanding of the realistic positive and negative possibilities of therapeutic cloning in the near future. This will, in time, generate the global legislations giving much needed ethical and humane boundaries to a field which is yet to be conquered. Works Referenced & ConsultedDyson, A. & Harris J. Eds. "Experiments on embryos" London, New York Routledge, 1990.Harris, J. Chapter 1 "The Art of the Possible", in Clones, Genes and Immortality, Oxford Oxford University Press, 1998.Hyde, Margaret O. & amp Hyde, Lawrence E. "Cloning and the new genetics" Hillside, N.J., U.S.A. Enslow Publishers, 1984.Lord, B. I., Potten, C. S., Cole, R. J. " obeisance cells and tissue homeostasis", Cambridge, New York Cambridge University Press, 1988.Nicholls, Mark, "MATCH, (Movement Against The Cloning of Humans)", in The Tide is Turning, http//www.match.inweb.co.uk/, July 9th, 1999.Pence, Gregory E. "Whos afraid of human cloning?", Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, c1998.Preston, Noel. "Understanding ethics", Leichhardt, N.S.W. Federation Press, 1996.